SUPPORT
US |

|
TOPICAL INDEX |
The Babylon Observer places his observations and
research material under the following main
topics.
Click the pictures to find out more. |

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|
|
|
|
babylonobserver.dubroom.org |
|
Fiction
as a Precursor to Fact |
Fiction as a Precursor to Fact: Sci-fi "Predictive Programming" and the Emergent World Religion
The New Religious Consciousness
Aldous Huxley first presented the
"scientific dictatorship" to the
public imagination in his book Brave New
World. In Dope, Inc., associates of
political dissident Lyndon LaRouche claim
that Huxley's book was actually a "mass
appeal" organizing document written
"on behalf of one-world order"
(Dope, Inc. 538). The book also claims the
United States is the only place where
Huxley's "science fiction classic"
is taught as an allegorical condemnation of
fascism (Dope, Inc. 538). If this is true,
then the "scientific dictatorship"
presented within the pages of his 1932 novel
Brave New World is a thinly disguised roman
a clef--a novel that thinly veils real
people or events--awaiting tangible
enactment.
Such is often the case with "science
fiction" literature. According to
researcher Michael Hoffman, this literary
genre is instrumental in the indoctrination
of the masses into the doctrines of the
elite:
“Traditionally, 'science fiction' has
appeared to most people as an adolescent
genre, the province of time-wasting
fantasies. This has been the great strength
of this genre as a vehicle for the
inculcation of the ideology favored by the
Cryptocracy. As J.H. Towsen points out in
Clowns, only when people think they are not
buying something can the real sales pitch
begin. While it is true that with the
success of NASA's Gemini space program and
the Apollo moon flights more serious
attention and respectability was accorded
'science fiction,' nonetheless in its
formative seeding time, from the late 19th
century through the 1950s, the predictive
program known as 'science fiction' had the
advantage of being derided as the solitary
vice of misfit juveniles and marginal
adults.” (205)
Thus, "science fiction" is a means
of conditioning the masses to accept future
visions that the elite wish to tangibly
enact. This process of gradual and subtle
inculcation is dubbed "predictive
programming." Hoffman elaborates:
"Predictive programming works by means
of the propagation of the illusion of an
infallibly accurate vision of how the world
is going to look in the future" (205).
Also dubbed "sci-fi inevitabilism"
by Hoffman, predictive programming is
analogous to a virus that infects its hosts
with the false belief that it is:
Useless to resist central, establishment
control.
Or it posits a counter-cultural alternative
to such control which is actually a
counterfeit, covertly emanating from the
establishment itself.
That the blackening (pollution) of earth is
as unavoidable as entropy.
That extinction ('evolution") of the
species is inevitable.
That the reinhabitation of the earth by the
"old gods" (Genesis 6:4), is our
stellar scientific destiny. (8)
Memes (contagious ideas) are instilled
through the circulation of "mass
appeal" documents under the guise of
"science fiction" literature. Once
subsumed on a psychocognitive level, these
memes become self-fulfilling prophecies,
embraced by the masses and outwardly
approximated through the efforts of the
elite.
In addition to spreading virulent strains of
thought, sci-fi has also been instrumental
in the promulgation of Darwinism. For
instance, the sci-fi literature of Freemason
H.G. Wells would play an important role in
promulgating the concept of evolution. J.P.
Vernier reveals Wells' religious adherence
to the concept of evolution and its
inspiration on him as an author of science
fiction:
“The impact of the theory of evolution on
his [Wells'] mind is well known: it was
first felt when he attended the Lectures of
T.H. Huxley, at South Kensington, in 1884
and 1885, and, ten years later, evolution
was to provide him with the fundamental
theme of his "scientific romances"
and of many of his short stories.”
- "Evolution as a Literary Theme in
H.G. Wells's Science Fiction," 70
J.P. Vernier elaborates on the role of
sci-fi literature, particularly Wells'
"scientific romances," in
promulgating evolutionary thought:
“Science fiction is admittedly almost
impossible to define; readers all think they
know what it is and yet no definition will
cover all its various aspects. However, I
would suggest that evolution, as presented
by Wells, that is a kind of mutation
resulting in the confrontation of man with
different species, is one of the main themes
of modern science fiction.”
- "Evolution as a Literary Theme in
H.G. Wells's Science Fiction," 85
In Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future,
Bishop Seraphim Rose expands on the role of
sci-fi in the promulgation of evolutionary
thought:
“The center of the science fiction
universe (in place of the absent God) is
man--not usually man as he is now, but man
as he will 'become' in the future, in
accordance with the modern mythology of
evolution.” (73)
Reiterating Vernier's contention that the
sci-fi notion of evolution is "a kind
of mutation resulting in the confrontation
of man with different species," Rose
observes:
“Although the heroes of science fiction
stories are usually recognizable humans, the
story interest often centers about their
encounters with various kinds of 'supermen'
from 'highly-evolved' races of the future
(or sometimes, the past), or from distant
galaxies. The idea of the possibility of
'highly-evolved' intelligent life on other
planets has become so much a part of the
contemporary mentality that even respectable
scientific (and semi-scientific)
speculations assume it as a matter of
course. Thus, one popular series of books
(Erich von Daniken, Chariots of the Gods?,
Gods From Outer Space) finds supposed
evidence of the presence of
'extraterrestrial' beings or 'gods' in
ancient history, who are supposedly
responsible for the sudden appearance of
intelligence in man, difficult to account
for by the usual evolutionary theory.”
(73)
According to Rose, science fiction's
traditional depiction of religion suggests
that the future will inherit a nebulous and
indefinable spirituality:
“Religion, in the traditional sense, is
absent, or else present in a very incidental
or artificial way. The literary form itself
is obviously a product of the
'post-Christian' age (evident already in the
stories of Poe and Shelley). The science
fiction universe is a totally secular one,
although often with 'mystical' overtones of
an occult or Eastern kind. 'God,' if
mentioned at all, is a vague and impersonal
power, not a personal being (for example,
the 'Force' of Star Wars, a cosmic energy
that has its evil as well as good side). The
increasing fascination of contemporary man
with science fiction themes is a direct
reflection of the loss of traditional
religious values.” (73)
Expanding on the "mystical" themes
of sci-fi, researcher Carl Raschke asserts
that the literary genre invariably extends
itself into the realm of the occult:
“The snug relationship between occult
fantasy and the actual practice of the
occult is well established in history.
Writers such as H.P. Lovecraft and Edgar
Rice Burroughs, progenitor of the Tarzan and
Jane tales, were practicing occultists.”
(303)
Raschke explains that sci-fi presents a
future that has rediscovered the occult
traditions of its past:
“Increasingly, science fiction with its
vistas of the technological future
intertwines with the neopagan and the
medieval. The synthesis was first achieved
with polished artistry in Lucas' Star Wars
trilogy.” (398)
Eloquently summarizing the close correlation
between science fiction and occultism,
Raschke states: "Science fiction,
'science fantasy,' pure fantasy, and the
world of esoteric thought and activity have
all been intimately connected
historically." (303)
Clearly, such ideas are fantastic to say the
least. Yet, they have been given serious
credence by contemporary scientists:
“Serious scientists in the Soviet Union
speculate that the destruction of Sodom and
Gomorrah was due to a nuclear explosion,
that 'extraterrestrial' beings visited earth
centuries ago, that Jesus Christ may have
been a 'cosmonaut,' and that today 'we may
be on the threshold of a 'second coming' of
intelligent beings from outer space.'
Equally serious scientists in the West think
the existence of 'extraterrestrial
intelligences' likely enough that for at
least 18 years they have been trying to
establish contact with them by means of
radio telescopes, and currently there are at
least six searches being conducted by
astronomers around the world for intelligent
radio signals from space.” (Rose 73-74)
According to Rose, the sci-fi genre's
influence upon science could, in turn,
provoke a shift in religious thinking:
“Contemporary Protestant and Roman
Catholic 'theologians'--who have become
accustomed to follow wherever 'science'
seems to be leading - speculate in turn in
the new realm of 'exotheology' (the
'theology of outer space') concerning what
nature the 'extraterrestrial' races might
have (see Time magazine, April 24, 1978). It
can hardly be denied that the myth behind
science fiction has a powerful fascination
even among many learned men of our day.”
(74)
In his final assessment of science fiction,
Rose concludes that this ostensibly
"scientific and non-religious"
genre is, in truth, the "leading
propagator (in a secular form) of the 'new
religious consciousness'" that is
gradually supplanting Christianity (77).
Laced with occultism and intimations of an
emergent pagan spirituality, science fiction
could be facilitating a paradigm shift in
religious thinking.
Secularization: A Segue for Humanism
Such a paradigm shift could already be
underway. Among one of its chief
"evangelists" is William Sims
Bainbridge, sociologist and member of the
National Science Foundation. Bainbridge
concerns himself predominantly with the
development of a new world religion, which
he dubs the "Church of God
Galactic." Expanding on the
characteristics intrinsic to such a church,
Bainbridge suggests, "its most likely
origins are in science fiction"
("Religions for a Galactic
Civilization").
According to Bainbridge, secularization
provides the religio-cultural segue for this
new religion. Examining the sociological
phenomenon of secularization, Bainbridge
makes an interesting observation:
“Secularization does not mean a decline in
the need for religion, but only a loss of
power by traditional denominations. Studies
of the geography of religion show that where
the churches become weak, cults and
occultism explode to fill the spiritual
vacuum.”
- "Religions for a Galactic
Civilization"
Secularization has been commonly associated
with atheism. Indeed, past periods of
secularization have seen the decline of
theistic faiths and a general rejection of
traditional notions of God. No doubt, the
publication of Origin of the Species and the
subsequent widespread promotion of
evolutionary thought had this effect.
However, periods of secularization do not
represent the obliteration of religion, but
the preparation of the dominant
religio-cultural milieu for the arrival of a
new religion. Secularization and its
correlative, atheism, only act as a catalyst
for an enormous paradigm shift. This begins
with the realization of a significant
philosophical paradox intrinsic to atheism.
Authors Ron Carlson and Ed Decker explain
this intrinsic paradox:
“It is philosophically impossible to be an
atheist, since to be an atheist you must
have infinite knowledge in order to know
absolutely that there is no God. But to have
infinite knowledge, you would have to be God
yourself. It's hard to be God yourself and
an atheist at the same time!” (17)
In order to be philosophically consistent,
the atheist must eventually conclude that
he/she is a god. Whittaker Chambers, former
member of the communist underground in
America, revealed the name of this faith in
one's own intrinsic divinity:
“Humanism is not new. It is, in fact,
man's second oldest faith. Its promise was
whispered in the first days of Creation
under the Tree of the knowledge of Good and
Evil: 'Ye shall be as gods.'” (Qutd. in
Baker 206)
Simply stated, humanism is the religion of
self-deification. Its god is Man, spelled
with a capital M to denote the purported
divinity intrinsic to humanity. Of course,
this was also the religion of Freemasonry.
In fact, humanism and Masonry have shared a
long historical relationship. In The Keys of
this Blood, deceased Vatican insider Malachi
Martin examined the emergence of "a
network of Humanist associations"
throughout early-Renaissance Italy (518-19).
These organizations represented:
“a revolt against the traditional
interpretation of the Bible as maintained by
the ecclesiastical and civil authorities,
and against the philosophical and
theological underpinnings provided by the
Church for civil and political life.”
(519)
Although these groups espoused an ostensible
belief in God, their notions of a Supreme
Being were largely derivative of the
Kabbala:
“Not surprisingly given such an animus,
these associations had their own conception
of the original message of the Bible and of
God's revelation. They latched onto what
they considered to be an ultrasecret body of
knowledge, a gnosis, which they based in
part on cultic and occultist strains
deriving from North Africa-notably,
Egypt-and, in part, on the classical Jewish
Kabbala.” (519)
Thirty-third Degree Freemason Albert Pike
revealed that "all the Masonic
associations owe to it [the Kabbala] their
Secrets and their Symbols" (Pike 744).
According to Martin, however, this ancient
Hebraic doctrine was modified considerably
by the early humanists:
“Whether out of historical ignorance or
willfulness of both, Italian humanists
bowdlerized the idea of Kabbala almost
beyond recognition. They reconstructed the
concept of gnosis, and transferred it to a
thoroughly this-worldly plane. The special
gnosis they sought was a secret knowledge of
how to master the blind forces of nature for
a sociopolitical purpose.” (519-20)
Many of the semiotic artifacts comprising
the early humanists's iconography and jargon
were also directly related to Masonry:
“Initiates of those early humanist
associations were devotees of the Great
Force--the Great Architect of the
Cosmos--which they represented under the
form of the Sacred Tetragrammaton, YHWH, the
Jewish symbol for the name of the divinity
that was not to be pronounced by mortal
lips. They borrowed other symbols--the
Pyramid and the All-Seeing Eye--mainly from
Egyptian sources.” (Martin 520)
The Great Architect of the Cosmos, the
All-Seeing Eye, and the Pyramid also
comprise the esoteric semiology of
Freemasonry. What is the explanation for all
of these commonalities? According to Martin,
these shared characteristics were the result
of a merger between the humanists and the
old Mason guilds:
“In other northern climes, meanwhile, a
far more important union took place, with
the humanists. A union that no one could
have expected. In the 1300s, during the time
that the cabalist--humanist associations
were beginning to find their bearings, there
already existed--particularly in England,
Scotland and France-medieval guilds of men
who worked with ax, chisel and mallet in
freestone. Freemasons by trade, and
God-fearing in their religion, these were
men who fitted perfectly into the hierarchic
order of things on which their world
rested.” (521)
Evidently, there couldn't have been two
organizations that were more diametrically
opposed than Masonry and humanism:
“No one alive in the 1300s could have
predicted a merger of minds between
freemason guilds and the Italian humanists.
The traditional faith of the one, and the
ideological hostility to both tradition and
faith of the other, should have made the two
groups about as likely to mix as oil and
water.” (Martin 522)
Nevertheless, the late 1500s would witness
the amalgamation of these two groups (Martin
522). The most evident corollary of this
organizational coalescence was a noticeable
difference in recruiting practices:
“As the number of working or 'operative,'
freemasons diminished progressively, they
were replaced by what were called Accepted
Masons--gentlemen of leisure, aristocrats,
even members of royal families--who lifted
ax, chisel and mallet only in the
ultrasecret symbolic ceremonies of the
lodge, still guarded by the 'Charges' and
the 'Mason Word.' The 'speculative' mason
was born. The new Masonry shifted away from
all allegiance to Roman ecclesiastical
Christianity.” (Martin 522)
Indeed, the new Masonic doctrine appeared to
be one that thoroughly eschewed Christian
concepts:
“There was no conceptual basis by which
such a belief could be reconciled with
Christianity. For precluded were all such
ideas as sin, Hell for punishment and Heaven
for reward, and eternally perpetual
Sacrifice of the Mass, saints and angels,
priest and pope.” (522)
The new Mason was no longer an architect of
freestone. Instead, he was an architect of
the technocratic Utopia mandated by Bacon's
New Atlantis. His god was Man himself, an
emergent deity sculpted by the Kabbalistic
golem of nature through the occult process
of "becoming." Of course, this
concept would later be disseminated on the
popular level as Darwinism and the world
would call it "evolution."
These humanist-Masonic concepts remain
firmly embedded within the science fiction
genre. In an interview with humanist David
Alexander, Star Trek creator Gene
Roddenberry commented:
“As nearly as I can concentrate on the
question today, I believe I am God;
certainly you are, I think we intelligent
beings on this planet are all a piece of
God, are becoming God.” (568)
In addition to espousing this core precept
of the humanist-Masonic religion,
Roddenberry's Star Trek presented a
technocratic world government under the
appellation of the "Federation."
Of course, one could argue that such
concepts are simply part of an innocuous
fiction concocted for entertainment.
According to Bainbridge, however, there is
"government-encouraged research"
devoted to the realization of "the Star
Trek prophecies"
("Memorials"). Apparently, the
demarcations between fact and fiction are
becoming increasingly indiscernible.
As science fiction vigorously proselytizes
the masses in the humanist-Masonic religion,
the spiritual vacuum left by secularization
is being filled. As Bainbridge previously
stated, the immediate elements to supplant
the orthodox ecclesiastical authority are
"cults and occultism"
("Religions for a Galactic
Civilization"). The contemporary
religious counterculture movement has most
vividly expressed itself through the
explosion of scientistic cults in the late
twentieth and early twenty-first century.
Bainbridge himself has been actively
involved with some of these cults, which act
as working models for his Church of God
Galactic.
Building the Church of God Galactic
Examining the most promising model for the
Church of God Galactic, Bainbridge makes the
following recommendation:
“Today there exists one highly effective
religion actually derived from science
fiction, one which fits all the known
sociological requirements for a successful
Church of God Galactic. I refer, of course,
to Scientology.”
- "Religions for a Galactic
Civilization"
Indeed, Scientology meets all the
prerequisites for Bainbridge's Church of God
Galactic, one of which being the cult's
origins with science fiction. Carl Raschke
explains:
“L. Ron Hubbard, architect of the
controversial religion known as Scientology,
openly and consciously decided to convert
his science fiction work into a working
belief system upon which a
"church" was set up.” (303)
As a derivation of science fiction,
Scientology inherited a central feature of
the genre: Darwinism. In Dianetics,
Scientologist high priest L. Ron Hubbard
reveals the movement's adherence to
evolutionary thought:
“It is fairly well accepted in these times
that life in all forms evolved from the
basic building blocks: the virus and the
cell. Its only relevance to Dianetics is
that such a proposition works--and actually
that is all we ask of Dianetics. There is no
point to writing here a vast tome on biology
and evolution. We can add some chapters to
those things, but Charles Darwin did his job
well and the fundamental principles of
evolution can be found in his and other
works. The proposition on which Dianetics
was originally entered was evolution.”
(69; emphasis added)
Darwinian thought is especially evident in
Scientology's preoccupation with survival.
In Dianetics, Hubbard opines: "The
dynamic principle of existence is
survival" (52). In this statement, one
can discern echoes of the Darwinian mantra:
"Survival of the fittest." Hubbard
proceeds to enumerate four dynamics of
survival. It is within the fourth dynamic
that the astute reader will recognize
Darwinism's corresponding religion of
self-deification: "Dynamic four is the
thrust toward potential immortality of
mankind as a species"(53; emphasis
added). Of course, immortality is a trait
reserved only for gods. Again, the religious
theme of man's evolutionary ascent towards
apotheosis becomes evident.
Eventually, Hubbard's church of Scientology
"suffered religious schisms which
spawned other cults" (Bainbridge,
"Religions for a Galactic
Civilization). One of the resulting sects
was the Process Church of Final Judgement, a
satanic cult that was the subject of a
five-year ethnographic study conducted by
Bainbridge ("Social Construction from
Within: Satan's Process"). Enamored
with the group, Bainbridge praised the
Process Church as a "remarkably
aesthetic and intelligent alternative to
conventional religion" ("Social
Construction from Within: Satan's
Process").
A deeper examination of this scientistic
cult reveals that its adherents probably
retained much of the Darwinian thought
intrinsic to its progenitor, Scientology.
One case in point is the theology of the
group's founder, Robert de Grimston.
Bainbridge delineates this theology:
“Robert de Grimston's theology was
Hegelianism in the extreme. For every thesis
(Christ, Jehovah) there was an antithesis
(Satan, Lucifer), and the cult aimed to
achieve a final synthesis of all these
dichotomies in the rebirth of GOD. Indeed,
one way of explaining the failure of The
Process is to note that it promised a Heaven
on earth to members, yet it delivered
something less.”
- "Social Construction from Within:
Satan's Process"
Like Processean theology, Darwinian
evolution also exhibits an inherently
Hegelian framework. The organism (thesis)
comes into conflict with nature (antithesis)
resulting in a newly enhanced species
(synthesis), the culmination of the
evolutionary process (Marrs, Circle of
Intrigue, 127). A similar dialectical
framework was distilled in an allegorical
form by H.G. Wells, a Freemason and
protégé of Darwinian apologist T.H.
Huxley. W. Warren Wagar elaborates:
“In the symbolic prologue to The Undying
Fire, he [Wells] even likened the opposition
of essence and existence to the interplay of
good and evil. God was here represented as
the inscrutable creator, who created things
perfect and exact, only to allow the
intrusion of a marginal inexactness in
things through the intervention of Satan.
God corrected the marginal uniqueness by
creation at a higher level, and Satan upset
the equilibrium all over again. Satan's
intervention permitted evolution, but the
ultimate purpose of God was by implication a
perfect and finished and evolved absolute
unity.” (104-05)
The Processeans shared Wells' notion of
Satan, which portrayed the Devil as a
necessary element of instability:
“For Processeans, Satan was no crude beast
but an intellectual principle by which God
could be unfolded into several parts,
accomplishing the repaganization of religion
and the remystification of the world.”
- Bainbridge, "Social Construction from
Within: Satan's Process"
This portrait of an ongoing dialectical
conflict echoes the Masonic dictum: Ordo Ab
Chao (Latin for Order out of Chaos). The
dialectical process underpins evolution,
which began with the Masonic doctrine of
"becoming." The final goal of a
repaganized world synchronizes very well
with Freemasonic occultism. All comprise the
new religious consciousness being
promulgated by science fiction. This is the
future that the masses are being conditioned
to accept by sci-fi predictive programming.
In Religion and the Social Order, Bainbridge
presented the following mandate:
“It is time to move beyond mere
observation of scientistic cults and use the
knowledge we have gained of recruitment
strategies, cultural innovation, and social
needs to create better religions than the
world currently possesses. At the very
least, unobtrusive observation must be
supplemented by active experimentation.
Religions are human creations. Our society
quite consciously tries to improve every
other kind of social institution, why not
religion? Members of The Process, founded
mainly by students from an architecture
school, referred to the creation of their
cult as religious engineering, the
conscious, systematic, skilled creation of a
new religion. I propose that we become
religious engineers.”
To understand what sort of faith is being
sculpted by the technocratic "religious
engineers," one need only look to
Scientology and the Process Church. Both of
these scientistic cults, awash in Darwinism
and its corresponding humanist-Masonic
religion of apotheosized Man, are microcosms
for an emergent one-world religion.
Heralding the Technocratic Messiah
Of course, a new world religion requires a
new world messiah. There is even a messianic
legacy within Masonic mythology.
Thirty-third degree Mason Albert Pike
states:
“Behold the object, the end, the result,
of the great speculation and logomachies of
antiquity; the ultimate annihilation of
evil, and restoration of Man to his first
estate, by a Redeemer, a Masayah, a
Christos, the incarnate Word, Reason, or
Power of Diety.” (274)
The astute reader will immediately notice
the capital M in "Man," denoting
humanity's intrinsic divinity. Being a god
was humanity's "first estate."
Thus, the Masonic messiah is not the
transcendent Creator incarnated as Jesus
Christ. Instead, Masonry posits that the
messiah is within Man himself. According to
Masonic doctrine, humanity's cognizance of
its innate divinity is integral to achieving
apotheosis. Pike recapitulates:
“Thus self-consciousness leads us to
consciousness of God, and at last to
consciousness of an infinite God. That is
the highest evidence of our own existence
and it is the highest evidence of His.”
(709)
As for the early Christians who believed
that Jesus was the transcendent God clothed
in flesh, Pike derisively portrays them as
superstitious simpletons:
“The dunces who led primitive Christianity
astray, by substituting faith for science,
reverie for experience, the fantastic for
the reality; and the inquisitors who for so
many ages waged against Magism a war of
extermination, have succeeded in shrouding
in darkness the ancient discoveries of the
human mind; so that we now grope in the dark
to find again the key of the phenomena of
nature.” (732)
Pike's reprimand concerning Christianity's
substitution of faith for science betrays
Masonry's scientistic proclivities. Earlier
in human history, such scientistic belief
was less powerful. However, in this
post-Masonic era where the doctrine of the
elite's epistemological cartel has been
fully externalized, scientism rules the day.
As such, the present scientistic society
demands a scientistic messiah.
Paradoxically, this occult concept of
self-deification asserts that humanity's
internal deity requires an external
facilitator to achieve full manifestation.
Again, science fiction has played an
integral role in preparing the masses for
such an eventuality. One of the most
significant pieces of messianic sci-fi
predictive programming is Steven Spielberg's
E.T. The central theme of the film E.T. is
most succinctly encapsulated in the familiar
shot that also adorned many of the movie's
publicity posters. Of course, this is the
shot of the outstretched hand of the movie's
human protagonist touching the glowing
fingertip of an alien hand reaching
downward.
The symbolic meaning embedded within this
image becomes evident when compared with
Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel painting. Like
the thematically axial shot in E.T.,
Michelangelo's portrait presents Adam
"with a raised arm and in fingertip
union with God" (377). The semiotic
synchronicity between these two pictures is
clearly religious. Spielberg's pivotal shot
in E.T. is an intertextual reference to
Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel painting.
Both appear to be premised upon the
Christian theme of God communing with His
own creation. The ministry of Jesus Christ,
whom Christians believe to have been God
incarnate, tangibly enacted this theme.
Reiterating this theme, Spielberg's film
features an extraterrestrial
"messiah" who reproduces many of
Jesus' miracles. The most significant
"miracles" performed by this
visitor is its own resurrection and
ascension into heaven. Yet, despite these
ostensible Christian elements, Spielberg's
film cannot be construed as a
"Christian allegory." Both
instances, it should be noted, are explained
in a naturalistic context. More
specifically, the "resurrection"
is merely the creature's exceptional
immunological response to Earth's bacteria
and the "ascension" evacuation via
a waiting spacecraft.
Yet, Spielberg's bowdlerization of Christian
theology is anything but new or innovative.
E.T. merely continues a tradition embodied
by Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel painting.
The portrait departs from the traditional
Christian paradigm concerning the Genesis
account and humanity's relationship with its
Creator. Ian Taylor explains how
Michelangelo's painting deviates from the
traditional Genesis account:
“Unlikely as this may seem, it is,
nevertheless, a remarkable fact that when
painted in 1508 Michelangelo took the bold
step of departing from the biblical account
of the creation of man to depict what is
today seen to be a theistically evolved
version. Prior to this time, artists had
stuck to the Genesis description of a
non-living being made from the dust of the
ground becoming a 'living soul' by the
infusion of God's breath (Genesis 2:7).
Michelangelo's now famous painting of the
creation of Adam shows a human form quite
evidently alive with a raised arm and in
fingertip union with God. The question this
painting raises is that since the creature
is alive, what kind of pre-Adamic being does
it represent? Enterprising Jesuit teachers
have seized upon this as historical
vindication of the truth of theistic
evolution, so that the creature depicted
must then be some kind of advanced
anthropoid. There can be absolute certainty
that nothing could have been further from
Michelangelo's mind, yet the Greek influence
and tendency to rationalize revelation is
represented symbolically throughout the
entire painting, not in style, but by the
insertion of Greek sibyls between the Old
Testament prophets.” (377)
Like Michelangelo's portrait, Spielberg's
E.T. attempts to reconceptualize man's
relationship with the heavenly. The film is
set in the modern age of science, a time
when mystical cosmology has been supplanted
by human reason. This contemporary cultural
milieu is one governed by scientism. In this
context, the human protagonist of E.T.
represents an Adept or, as they are called
in esoteric circles, an Illuminatus
("illuminated one"). With his
evolutionary development augmented through
extraterrestrial intervention and a paradigm
shift just on the horizon, Spielberg's human
protagonist is the next in a long line of
Avatars. The extraterrestrial visitor is an
anthropomorphic representation of
Prometheus, who imparts the torch of Wisdom
unto man.
As is evidenced by films like Close
Encounters of the Third Kind and E.T., the
relatively recent UFO phenomenon made a
significant impression upon Spielberg. In
fact, the UFO mystery has prompted many to
reconceptualize their relationship with the
heavenly realm. Timothy Good provides an
example of such a shift in thinking:
“Miles Copeland, former CIA organizer and
intelligence officer, related an interesting
story to me involving the Agency's attempt
on one occasion to use fictional UFO
sightings to spread disinformation. The
purpose, in this case, was to 'dazzle' and
intoxicate' the Chinese, who had themselves
on several occasions fooled the CIA into
sending teams to a desert in Sinkiang
Province, West China, to search for
nonexistent underground 'atomic energies.'
The exercise took place in the early 1960s,
Copeland told me, and involved launching
fictional UFO sighting reports from many
different areas. The project was headed by
Desmond Fitzgerald of the Special Affairs
Staff (who made a name for himself by
inventing harebrained schemes for
assassinating Fidel Castro). The UFO
exercise was 'just to keep the Chinese
off-balance and make them think we were
doing things we weren't,' Copeland said.
'The project got the desired results, as I
remember, except that it somehow got picked
up by a lot of religious nuts in Iowa and
Nebraska or somewhere who took it seriously
enough to add an extra chapter to their
version of the New Testament!” (357)
If this UFO manipulation perpetrated by the
CIA was effective enough to compel certain
factions to embellish and pervert the
Scriptures, imagine what a deception on a
larger scale could accomplish. Rose states:
“Science fiction has given the images,
'evolution,' has produced the philosophy,
and the technology of the 'space age' has
supplied the plausibility for such
encounters.” (Rose 91)
Apparently, the idea of extraterrestrials
visiting earth was so powerful that it
prompted many to reconsider their
traditional religious notions. No doubt, the
UFO phenomenon had the same effect upon
Spielberg. Herein is the ultimate theme
underpinning the imagery in E.T.: the
redefinition of God.
The fingertip union between terrestrial
anthropoid and extraterrestrial anthropoid
represents the religious mandate for the
creation of a new scientistic faith. Through
sci-fi predictive programming, filmmakers
like Spielberg could be serving as
"religious engineers" in the
construction of a new messianic legacy.
However, this savior is anything but the
Christ of Christianity.
Consider the following account of Linda
Moulton Howe. During a meeting with Richard
Doty, an intelligence officer with the
United States military, Howe was presented
with a briefing paper regarding alien
visitation. In its body, one finds a claim
heralding the arrival of an individual that
the film E.T. has prepared the public to
accept. Howe elaborates:
“There was a paragraph that stated, 'Two
thousand years ago extraterrestrials created
a being' that was placed on this earth to
teach mankind about love and
non-violence.” (151)
Was Doty acting on behalf of some hidden
"religious engineers?" Was he a
counterfeit John the Baptist, appointed to
introduce the world to a technocratic
Christ? Now, it is important to recall
Doty's connections with military
intelligence. He has worked within circles
where the Freemasonic myth of Sirius is
actively circulated. If such a deception is
underway, sci-fi predictive programming like
E.T. has helped cultivate the fertile soil
of public imagination.
In essence, E.T. is the cinematic rallying
call for the reengineering of religions. In
Morals and Dogma, 33rd degree Freemason
Albert Pike states: "God is, as man
conceives Him, the reflected image of man
himself" (223). According to the
Scriptures, God made man in His own image.
According to the hidden "religious
engineers," it is man's time to return
the favor.
Sources Cited
Alexander, David. Star Trek Creator. New
York: Dutton Signet, 1994.
Bainbridge, William Sims. "Religions
for a Galactic Civilization." Excerpted
from Science Fiction and Space Futures,
edited by Eugene M. Emme. San Diego:
American Astronautical Society, pages
187-201, 1982.
"Social Construction from Within:
Satan's Process." Excerpted from The
Satanism Scare, edited by James T.
Richardson, Joel Best, and David G. Bromley,
New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pages 297-310,
1991.
"New Religions, Science, and
Secularization." Excerpted from
Religion and the Social Order, 1993, Volume
3A, pages 277-292, 1993.
"Memorials." Excerpted from Social
Sciences for a Digital World. Edited by Marc
Renaud. Paris: Organisation for Economic
Co-Operation and Development, 2000.
Carlson, Ron, Ed Decker, Fast Facts on False
Teachings, Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House
Publishers, 1994.
Editors of Executive Intelligence Review,
Dope Inc., Washington, D.C.: Executive
Intelligence Review, 1992.
Hoffman, Michael. Secret Societies and
Psychological Warfare. Coeur d'Alene, Idaho:
Independent History & Research, 2001.
Howe, Linda Moulton. An Alien Harvest. 1989.
Huntingdon Valley, PA: Linda Moulton Howe
Productions, 1995.
Good, Timothy. Above Top Secret: The
Worldwide UFO Cover-Up. New York: William
Morrow, 1988.
Hubbard, L. Ron. Dianetics. Los Angeles, CA:
Bridge Publications Inc., 1986.
Marrs, Texe. Circle of Intrigue. Austin, TX:
Living Truth Publishers, 1995.
Martin, Malachi. The Keys of this Blood. New
York: Simon and Schuster, 1991
Pike, Albert. Morals and Dogma. 1871.
Richmond, Virginia: L.H. Jenkins, Inc.,
1942.
Raschke, Carl A. Painted Black. New York:
Harper Collins Publishers, 1990.
Rose, Seraphim. Orthodoxy and the Religion
of the Future. 1975. Platina, CA: Saint
Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 1996.
Taylor, Ian T. In the Minds of Men: Darwin
and the New World Order. Toronto: TFE
Publishing, 1999.
Vernier, J.P. "Evolution as a Literary
Theme in H.G. Wells's Science Fiction."
H.G. Wells and Modern Fiction. Ed. Darko
Suvin and Robert M. Philmus. New Jersey:
Associated UP, 1977
About the
Author: Phillip D. Collins acted as the
editor for The Hidden Face of Terrorism. He
has also written articles for Paranoia
Magazine, MKzine, News With Views,
B.I.P.E.D.: The Official Website of
Darwinian Dissent and Conspiracy Archive. He
has an Associate of Arts and Science.
Currently, he is studying for a bachelor's
degree in Communications at Wright State
University. During the course of his
seven-year college career, Phillip has
studied philosophy, religion, and classic
literature. He also co-authored the book,
The Ascendancy of the Scientific
Dictatorship: An Examination of Epistemic
Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st
Century, which is available online here.
|
THIS
ARTICLE FILES UNDER:
|
|
|
|
|
IN CASE THIS
ARTICLE WAS QUOTED FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, PLEASE
READ THE DISCLAIMER BELOW
|
§ 107. Limitations on exclusive rights:
Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
ORIGINAL
LAW TEXT
|
|
|
|
|